TechBloggin.com

Filed under: Storage

Western Digital’s hasty VelociRaptor already got reviewed by its lonesome, but for those thinking of getting a RAID system into their rig, HotHardware has taken a trio of ‘em, setup a RAID 5 array and put the drives through their collaborative paces. The configuration was made possible thanks to an Areca PCIe X8 hardware RAID card, and the results were rather impressive — to no one’s surprise, might we add. Across the entire volume, performance was generally linear save for a few small valleys along the way, burst speed was 598MB/sec and average read speed was 209.4MB/sec, which pretty much blew the doors off of everything that came before it. Number lovers, there’s more where this came from in the read link below.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Laptops

Who says you need a desktop chip packed within a 3-inch thick, 15-pound beast of a “laptop” to get decent FPS while at a LAN party? Intel’s speedy Core 2 Extreme Mobile X9000 checks in at 2.8GHz (prior to overclocking, of course), and promises to punish today’s latest games while sipping less power and generating less heat than the aforementioned alternatives. The gurus over at HotHardware were able to sit down with said chip and put it to the test; overall, the Mobile X9000 “proved itself to be as fast as its desktop counterparts in many scenarios, all the while consuming less power as a complete system in the Dell XPS M730 notebook testbed.” If you’re the type that gets all hot and bothered by benchmarks and graphs, there’s plenty of those in the read link below.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Desktops

If you’ll recall, we already witnessed a pre-production Wolfdale CPU outpace its competition back in August of last year, but the real deal has finally arrived. Over at Hot Hardware, the folks were able to crack open a retail Core 2 Duo E8500 processor, which comes in at 3.16GHz and features 6MB of L2 cache, a 1,333MHz FSB speed and is built on 45-nanometer technology. When put to the test, reviewers found this luscious piece of silicon to be quite the performer, noting that it was probably a better choice for gamers than a low-end quad-core chip. Still, with an expected price of just under three bills, it wasn’t exactly seen as the greatest of values, but if you’ve got the coin and happen to fit the market, the “Recommended” badge tells you everything you need to know.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Tablet PCs

Just over a fortnight after the TabletKiosk’s Sahara i440D Slate PC began shipping out to interested buyers, the niche machine has now been reviewed and benchmarked for those still mulling a purchase. The folks over at TabletPCReview noted that this machine was a breeze to tote around, had a solid feel, sported a satisfactory (though not awe-inspiring) display, and performed sufficiently enough for those not looking to actually replace their (likely more robust) laptop. Additionally, the pen functionality was highly praised as was the respectable array of ports, but the amount of noise and heat that this bad boy emitted was a slight turn-off. Still, the Sahara i440D benchmarked well against similar alternatives, and while we wouldn’t recommend 3D gaming or motion picture rendering on it, it seems like a solid choice for those in the market. Check out a videoed extension of the review after the jump.Continue reading TabletKiosk’s Sahara i440D Slate PC reviewed, benchmarked

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Desktops

Although we certainly noticed that Apple’s latest iMac felt snappy enough, the folks over at Primate Labs have cranked out a few numbers for the data freaks in the crowd to chew on. Granted, these benchmarks do not include the Core 2 Extreme iMac nor are they the most complete set of tests we’ve ever seen, but they do seem to give those on the fence a decent look at what level of performance increases they’ll be dealing with. Put simply, the new 2.4GHz 24-inch iMac posted “modest gains” across the board compared to the previous iterations that clocked in at 2.33GHz / 2.16GHz, and while the results don’t seem earth-shattering, those who rely on “memory-intensive applications (like Aperture or Photoshop)” would likely benefit most from the improved “integer, floating point. and memory / stream performance.” As you’d expect, the full skinny on the test results await you in the read link.

[Via AppleInsider]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Desktops

Calm down, you haven’t overslept by a couple of months or anything, as the Wolfdale we’re talking about here is in fact simply a 2.33GHz engineering sample of the forthcoming dual-core processor. Nevertheless, HKPEC labs was able to pit it against the 2.33GHz E6550, and the results weren’t too shabby. In a slew of tests including PC Mark, CineBench, Science Mark, SiSoft Sandra, and individual application trials, the Wolfdale managed to best the E6550 in every single facet. Of course, it didn’t exactly blow the current Core 2 Duo out of the water, but increasing performance by nearly 11-percent in Doom 3 and Far Cry, 5.53-percent in PC Mark, and around 8-percent in Office applications isn’t anything to sneeze at. Still, we’ve got quite a ride ahead before seeing a finalized Wolfdale, but feel free to humor yourself with the preliminary benchmarks below.

[Via The Inquirer]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by