TechBloggin.com

Filed under: HDTV

Hey, we hate lawsuits just as much as the next guy, but we’re finding it hard to fault Verizon for this one. Verizon and Time Warner Cable arrived in court on Wednesday to settle a tiff over some ads that Verizon claims offer up misleading info about Verizon’s FiOS service. Listed among the complaints include supposed false implications by TWC that FiOS requires a satellite dish, doesn’t include phone, broadband and video, and that Time Warner’s network is better. Time Warner Cable is naturally calling the lawsuit “without merit.” Verizon wants TWC to stop running the ads and issue a retraction, as well as compensate them for lost revenue. We’re not positive which ad Verizon is referring to, but if it’s anything like the ad after the break — which has some downright false implications about Time Warner Cable using fiber optics “for over a decade” — then Verizon very well might have something here. [Disclosure: Engadget is part of the Time Warner family]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Source: Paul Miller

written by

Filed under: HDTV, Home Entertainment

In a somewhat perplexing (okay, maybe not so much) release from Verizon, it is essentially crawling to the FCC and begging that it assist the telco in bolstering its own market share. How so? By enabling cable subscribers to jump ship without even notifying their cable company, that’s how. More specifically, it’s seeking to banish “a significant obstacle to consumer choice and competition in the market for bundled communications services” by allowing disconnect orders from the new provider (read: Verizon) to take the place of, you know, the customer calling up their carrier and shutting things down. Verizon argues that said procedure “significantly complicates the process of switching video providers, thereby entrenching the cable incumbents’ dominant market position.” Beyond the inordinately high level of ridiculousness crammed into those statements, we wonder if Verizon’s all geared up to start receiving similar letters from Comcast, Cablevision and the whole gang should any of its customers decide to walk away in silence.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: HDTV

You want to know — nay, you deserve to know — which service provides the most HD content. Engadget HD’s got the answer, see how your HD provider stacks up.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Ryan Block

written by

Filed under: Networking

For the fourth time in a week, an undersea communications cable in the Mediterranean Sea has apparently been cut, and while no official reports of subversion have surfaced just yet, things are beginning to get suspicious. Flag Telecom, a subsidiary of Indian conglomerate Reliance ADA Group, has had two cables damaged in the span of a week — a quandary it has never dealt with until now. As it stands, traffic from the Middle East and surrounding areas is being routed through various other cables in an attempt to remain online, but any more snips and we could be dealing with ping times eerily similar to those seen in 1993 (or much, much larger issues).

[Image courtesy of DivingCo]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Networking

It’s not like we haven’t seen consortiums working to establish better links between America and Asia, but the more the merrier, right? Apparently, Verizon Business has just recently received the all-important thumbs-up from the FCC to “activate and operate the Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system in the US.” The TPE cable is hailed as “the first next-generation undersea optical cable system directly linking the US and mainland China,” and is the first major system of its kind to land on America’s West Coast (Oregon, to be precise) in over seven years. For those curious, the 10,563-mile submarine communications cable will be able to support the equivalent of 62 million simultaneous phone calls — which is “more than 60 times the overall capacity of the existing cable directly linking the US and China” — and will initially provide capacity of up to 1.28Tbps. So, when will this thing be up and running? If all goes to plan, it should be fully operational by August (you know, prior to the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing).

[Image courtesy of Devicepedia]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: CES, Displays, Peripherals

Exhilarating, we know, but it is somewhat notable that Belkin has introduced a DisplayPort cable for the emerging connector. From what we can tell, there’s nothing exceptionally special about it outside of its early release, but you will be paying a pretty penny for it when it actually lands. Depending on cable length (3-, 6- or 10-feet), you’ll be asked to drop $59.99 to $109.99, and you can make said purchase this April in the US or later in 2008 in Canada, Europe, Asia and Australia.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Peripherals, Portable Audio, Portable Video

Sure, you could always wait around for Meridian’s wicked cool iRIS dock to output videos on your iPod in 1080p, but for those not looking to spend upwards of $370, Apple’s got a new peripheral just for you. The Component AV Cables — which are said to only play nice with the 3G nano, iPod classic, and iPod touch — enables you to pipe those movie clips onto a television set via component outs. Additionally, the accessory touts stereo audio inputs, a USB adapter for charging your iPod while it’s playing, and even an AC adapter in case your laptop (or any powered USB port) isn’t nearby. Reportedly, the 3G nano and iPod classic can output imagery at 480p or 576p resolutions, while the iPod touch supports 480i / 576i. Shipping in two to three weeks for $49.

[Thanks, Mauricio T. and Nick D.]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Without getting overly dramatic, word on the street is that Building B, a new-fangled startup based in Belmont, California, has developed an internet video “God box” which will allow OTA streams of traditional cable, internet video, and on-demand content without the need for a PC (i.e., directly to your 70-inch plasma television). Obviously, as the wave of internet TV steadily increases, dozens of companies are scrambling to unify the set-top, and streamline the end-user’s ability to get all their content in one place — not to mention suck up some totally righteous dough. Although Building B claims their technology will bring a heretofore unseen convergence to people’s living rooms, the boys in charge have been rather tight-lipped in regards to the “forthcoming” magic unit, or services and fees that would be associated with said device. Hopefully we’ll soon know what the “God box” can or can’t do with your television, what kind of “plague” capabilities it will include, and if it will be compatible with Atheism.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Joshua Topolsky

written by