TechBloggin.com

Filed under: Cellphones

Good news coming from the Motorola camp? Say it ain’t so! The long-standing feud between the flagging company and investor Carl Icahn has finally come to an end, and lo and behold, the pending litigation between the two has even been dismissed. Apparently the two parties managed to agree that (effective immediately) Keith Meister, a managing director of the Icahn investment funds and principal executive officer of Icahn Enterprises would be “appointed to serve on the [firm’s board of directors],” and William R. Hambrecht, founder, chairman and CEO of WR Hambrecht + Co. and co-founder of Hambrecht & Quist, would be “nominated for election” during the 2008 annual shareholders meeting. Heck, Moto’s even soliciting Mr. Icahn’s input in dealing with the hopeful separation of businesses — but then again, it would probably take advice from just about anyone given the current state of affairs.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Cellphones

Just days after the ITC upheld a December ruling that stated that Nokia did not violate Qualcomm patents, the UK High Court has handed down its decision on a lawsuit initially filed in May of 2006. If you’ll recall, the case involved Nokia’s GSM / GPRS / EDGE-only handsets and a pair of Qualcomm’s patents “that cover certain power saving and power control technologies.” Nearly two years after the spat got real, the court has ruled that “although the Nokia accused products included the patented technologies, the power saving patent is invalid and that the power control patent is partially valid but, insofar as it is valid, is not infringed by Nokia.” Granted, we reckon that could have been spilled out with fewer complexities, but the end result has Qualcomm considering “whether to seek permission from the UK court to amend the patents and appeal the decision.” Please, just let it go.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: HDTV, Home Entertainment

We’ll be straight with you — we aren’t surprised one iota by this one. For those keeping tabs, Samsung’s slate of Blu-ray players have been plagued with issues essentially from day one, and while it has released a flurry of firmware updates over the years in an attempt to mend a variety of incompatibility issues, even its recent BD-UP5000 hybrid player is being axed early on after giving owners all sorts of fits. Apparently, one particular buyer isn’t taking things lying down, and has decided to file suit against the mega-corp alleging that it has sold “defective Blu-ray players” to consumers. According to the suit, Sammy was “fully aware of the defective nature of the player [BD-P1200, in particular] at the time of manufacture and sale,” and it also claims that the firm has “failed to provide a remedy consistent with the products’ intended and represented uses.” More specifically, the verbiage picks on the units’ inability to play back select BD titles, and while some fixes have indeed been doled out, we still get the feeling many consumers have been left dissatisfied. Needless to say, this outcome should be interesting.

[Thank, Nfinity and Prey521]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Desktops, Laptops

True to its word, the US Supreme Court has started to hear arguments in one of those LG vs Quanta patent suits we’ve been following, with its eventual decision expected to have major effects on the rights of patent holders. Specifically, LG is arguing that since chipsets sold by Intel to Quanta use licensed manufacturing techniques and employ non-Intel components, Quanta also owes LG compensation as per its original agreement with Intel. Pretty confusing, we agree, but the Court’s final decision — expected in June — promises to clear up once and for all what has admittedly become a legal gray area concerning so-called “exhausted” patents.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Evan Blass

written by

Filed under: Portable Audio, Portable Video

Splendid news on the Canadian front — it seems as if that proposed tax on digital recorders and storage devices (you know, like Apple’s iPod for instance) will actually not come to pass. According to Judge Karen Sharlow, the board “had no legal authority to certify a tariff on digital audio recorders or on the memory permanently embedded in digital audio recorders.” The ruling enables all music lovin’ Canucks to breath a sigh of relief, as it makes tacking on fees ranging from C$5 ($4.95) to C$75 ($74) in order to “compensate the recording industry for music that was copied” illegal . From here, a decision still needs to be made to clarify the legality (or illegality) of copying music from discs to DAPs, but at least we’re seeing a touch of levelheadedness in the music biz, regardless.

[Via ArsTechnica]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Misc. Gadgets

Although the press release issued to announce the settlement between Vonage and AT&T earlier this month is still the shortest we’ve seen in all of 2007, we’re pretty certain the one doled out to trumpet the truce between Vonage and Nortel is holding down the two-spot. In just five wee sentences, we learn that the two have agreed in principle to end the litigation pending between ‘em, and though no cash will be changing hands, the agreement does involve a limited cross license to three patents per firm. Way to put the past behind before entering into the new year, we say.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Cellphones

No, this isn’t some horrific dream stuck on repeat. The legal quarrels between Nokia and Qualcomm are actually still ongoing, and while a US International Trade Commission judge has indeed issued an initial determination that favors Nokia, you can bet your bottom dollar that Qualcomm will be “petitioning the commission for a review.” Nevertheless, judge Paul Luckern reportedly “found no infringement or violation by Nokia of the three asserted Qualcomm patents,” which consequently led Nokia’s CFO to proclaim that this was simply “another failed attempt by Qualcomm to mislead both Nokia and the telecommunications industry.” Of course, we wouldn’t recommend striking this battle off as complete — after all, the determination now has to be forwarded on to the full commission for review, and it’s not slated to dole out a final call until April.

[Via Yahoo / Reuters]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by

Filed under: Cellphones

In the case that simply seems to never end, Nokia and Qualcomm are at each other’s throats yet again, and yes, it’s still over those darned GSM / WCDMA and CDMA2000 chipsets. The latest development involves Nokia asking the US International Trade Commission to “bar the import of some Qualcomm chipsets to the United States, alleging that they are infringing five Nokia patents.” Of note, it was stated that the ongoing battle is “worrying investors and the industry on both sides of the Atlantic,” but at this point, we think the two are just collaborating to create the longest running, most uninteresting legal hissy fit in history.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: Darren Murph

written by